beckie moriello ([info]beckiemoriello) wrote,
@ 2009-02-07 16:48:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend  Next Entry
I'm mainly posting this because about 6 months ago I said I would and I just ran across my PMBR stuff. But also because I doubt I'll ever get sick of bitching about law school.

Our first year classes are supposedly the most important. If you go the traditional route, your first year grades determine your summer jobs, which you're supposed to hope will eventually become post-school employment.

IOW, first year grades are *Really Important*.

The bar exam emphasizes these *Important* 1st-year subjects. However, (and here comes my thesis statement), there is almost no correlation between what's tested on the bar exam and what we learn in law school. To exemplify, below are my first year grades and my PMBR pre-test scores ranked best-->worst. Notice the non-existant correlation.

1L Grades
torts
criminal
property
contracts
constitutional

PMBR Pre-test
contracts
criminal
property
constiutional
torts

And just for fun, let's throw in a comparison of how much I had studied for each class in school.

Studied
constitutional
property
torts
contracts
criminal (to be fair, crim was worth fewer credits, so logically one would study less)

Silly legal education... Oh well, at least it prepared us for actual practice. (HA!!)



(5 comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]pants_of_doom
2009-02-08 03:56 am UTC (link)
I have totally the opposite view.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]beckiemoriello
2009-02-08 05:10 am UTC (link)
Opposite how? Like, you think law school correlated with bar prep and also prepared you for practice?

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]pants_of_doom
2009-02-08 04:25 pm UTC (link)
No, I think that law school teaches the kind of analytical thinking we need for practice and that the bar exam is an outdated hazing ritual that serves to show who can stand up to the strain of memorizing a lot of trivia.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]beckiemoriello
2009-02-09 02:17 am UTC (link)
Glad to hear at least someone thinks that legal educators are accomplishing their goal.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]melodyjune
2009-02-08 07:58 pm UTC (link)
I think it makes sense. If you take con law, for example, an essay exam can be extremely difficult because of all the gray area of the law which allows clever argument. A multiple choice question, on the other hand, cannot test these gray areas and, thus, must test a clear cut rule - making it far easier.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


(5 comments) - (Post a new comment)

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…